• About

Questions Are Power

Questions Are Power

Monthly Archives: March 2015

Necessary to Reject Paradox

29 Sunday Mar 2015

Posted by nightingale108 in Questions in Logic

≈ 2 Comments

Most of this blog seems to be about what I call “mystical” thinking which is offered as anti-logic or contradictory. It only seems that way. While I make claims like stupid is smart, raw is cooked, warmth is cold and any number of other kinds of nonsense, I don’t actually believe these things. The goal is to understand the failure of ideation, and so this post is a Buddhist disclaimer. Like a human body, ideas are beautiful in some ways but also stink in some places and have disgusting aspects. There is no escape from this problem except to strive away from ideation. I show paradox in the most eternal aspect of our knowledge- mathematics. It is a tremendous egoism to believe in mathematics in spite of these paradoxes. I do not think we should accept the failure of our minds and efforts to grasp the truth, but rather to reject paradox, mathematics and logic in its present state as a way to understand truth.

I would like to begin a new direction for this blog, guided by questions like “What conception of number will lead you naturally to reject the conception of number?” “How to make number imperfect in a gradual, pedagogical way?” Like the dying sound of a gong, good ideas lead you to peace of mind.

Numbers seem to march on towards infinity in a regular and perfect progression, like a straight highway to the horizon. However, the size of the highway changes as the eye looks into the distance, the distant numbers are different from the near ones. It is very much related to the relative difference between large numbers and small numbers- so that the difference between 1 and 2 is relatively larger than the difference between a thousand and 1,001. This aspect of number should not be concealed, but suggested rhetorically at every turn. The idea that numbers progress evenly and regularly is an abstraction that forgets the “size” or “numerousness” of the number. Without this context of the size of each number in the progression, the progression eventually loses cognizance of its subject – number. Eventually what the progression is about can barely be called number at all. The concept of the natural numbers, its progression of “always one more” does not live forever, but degrades and loses its meaning. Number theory is mortal.

Probability the Wrong Way

15 Sunday Mar 2015

Posted by nightingale108 in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

Posing that an improbable event is a chaotic one- that when something happens that probably should happen it is at least in a certain sense orderly, and, when something happens that is very improbable, it is an “accident” as Aristotle would put it.

Now, take an event A that repeats itself over and over. If there is any chance that something else could happen besides event A, the probability that event A would repeat itself over and over would get rather small rather quickly, making a large number of repetitions a chaotic event. But a repeatable event is the very definition of order, the fundament of any scientific theory or law. Even probability itself follows rules, if these rules have any exceptions at all (including the rules about exceptions), using them repeatedly over and over again to measure everything is actually a chaotic way to behave- particularly if you happen to believe that the vast majority of things are unknown- making any known laws very likely to have a lot of unknown exceptions.

A person who really believes probability is the sort of person that thinks he knows most everything, or most everything “is known,” and the possibilities can be counted out and calculated.

Education that involves a lot of repetition actually creates instability, since in a long view of the life of an ‘educated’ person, it is very likely he will reject everything he was made to repeat as fact.

Culture that is not in some sense like a wild beast, will not restrain its people.

Control, following a ruler (whether it is a yard stick or otherwise), comes at a price- that (technically before the control is exerted and over a very long view) the ruled will rebel. But how often?

Belief in rules, in the sense of rules carrying on indefinitely—be it the rule for calculating square-root of two or otherwise, is belief in chaos.

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • January 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2016
  • June 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014

Categories

  • Questions in Logic
  • Questions in Mathematics
  • The more technical stuff

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Questions Are Power
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Questions Are Power
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar