• About

Questions Are Power

Questions Are Power

Author Archives: Andrew Nightingale

It is like this (Ajarn Sumedho)

02 Sunday Jun 2024

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

I wrote in one of my poems about the chemical name of heroine. It actually happens that they create new chemicals similar to heroine but have no name yet in the US law. The US keeps adding new chemical names to the laws to ban heroine, but there is always a substance that is slightly different and has no name, then it can be sold in stores legally for a while until the US lawmakers catch up, and it goes back and forth like this, forever.
Our chemical names are too precise to capture heroine and make it illegal, but the US cannot accept vagueness in language, so it fails to keep its own laws.
yes a few vague words are better. so one great monk I was lucky enough to listen to in person is famous for the meditation practice of saying "it is like this" the words are so vague that you go looking for what it means in the here and now.

(((

22 Wednesday May 2024

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ 2 Comments

Idea Consumer

Its all in the cut
Its all in the invisible
Mark it cut it rip it snatch it
A splash a wave
We touch it and it feels ))) what we feel.
The mind that loves
To read
Don’t let anyone see
How beautiful you are

“i” am no more than mist

19 Friday Apr 2024

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

The mists have birthed a new toy soldier.

The mists twist as the heat and steam rises from Leon’s open wounds.

Just before his shadow in the mist disappears, a warrior emerges and plants her feet.

She enters a battle stance as her legs ripple with muscle, her right arm wrapped around her longspear, shield poised, she is naked. The male opponent’s weakling reaction to her visible body is against their own will. This clear vision of Her is rare, because she moves so fast you only see a blur, cloaking her nakedness and beautiful form.

In this vision you recognize one of her many blue tattoos clearly reading “Dierdre”. Her secrets are many, the spells of protection and strength woven in her tattoos.

The mists will not answer your futile strikes, but you will find Dierdre’s blade exactly where you are not looking.

Jung

12 Tuesday Mar 2024

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

The roots make the branches grow, and the branched leaves nourish the roots for growing. The growing goes back and forth from branch to root, root to branch, until this growing passes beyond our limited visions. 

We may say that the root is first, or the green spring, yet we cannot be sure how each seed will burst into life. And if, beyond our vision, the roots reach hell, only then can the high branches reach heaven. If our branches, reaching, touch heaven, the same reaching touches hell with our roots.

Response to an inverted poet

01 Friday Mar 2024

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

Cheers to nothing

I take an empty cup of kindness. Expectantly.
ought I receive for my aesthetic sacrifice?
The poem bereft of words

A dry, soulless,
immaculate uncertainty,

gossamer tulip wings limping, prancing,
(no! no!)
(Not verbs, we want nouns! Decorative, ornamental nouns! And don't say that ugly "adjective!")

on the shore she waits,
ear to the Earth
A sensitivity to butterfly effects,
and beauty returns to her in a bottle from the sea,
but it was only a grocery list.

The clouds speak poems

Featured

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment



First they look where the earth is overturned
They look for artifacts in excavations and burials.

They look on the surface of the land and sea
The multitude of tiny many-colored lives.

The clouds ask each other, and clouds move obtusely
Changing their questions constantly.

The clouds turn and ask the unconquered stars
And, secretly, the stars listen.

Vagueness is Essential

10 Wednesday Jan 2024

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

linguistics, logic, meaning, ontology, philosophy, semantics

Vagueness is not a matter of semantics. It is a problem that troubles the basic assertion that, as our old friend Berty Russell asserted as an axiom in the Principlia Mathematica, "Everything that is, is." The basics are a very interesting place to stay. We would like to say this is a basic and acceptable assertion, and it turns out to not be basic at all. In fact, no subject is elementary, and also every subject is elementary. 
 
Channell and Rowland argue that vagueness has pragmatic usefulness: "For language to be fully useful, therefore, in the sense of being able to describe all of human beings' experience, it must incorporate built-in flexibility. This flexibility resides, in part, in its capacity for vagueness" (p201 Channell 1994) Dr. Channell outlines various views of where vagueness comes from, from the difference between the "same idea" in different minds (Fodor 1977 in Channell 1994), to language (Peirce 1902 in Channell 1994), to physical reality (Russell 1923). Vagueness is found discussed in logic (Lakoff 1972 in Channell 1994) where it is argued (along with Russell) that "true" and "false" are vague, and so classical logic could be modified..." (p66 Nightingale 2019)

"[i]t is perfectly obvious, since colours form a continuum, that there are shades of colour concerning which we shall be in doubt whether to call them red or not, not because we are ignorant of the meaning of the word "red," but because it is a word the extent of whose application is essentially doubtful." (1923 Russell as quoted in Nightingale 2019, p66).

"The word "red" is vague in this respect because there are borderline cases where it is not clear whether or not we should call the case "red". Russell says "essentially doubtful" because this uncertainty is essential, in the sense of being a part of the nature of red. One deception here is in asserting that the "continuum" is a perfectly precise reality that can be expressed numerically. This renders vagueness a kind of error; without a perfectly known continuum underneath our words, vagueness is not error but has a reality of its own. Does the continuum suffer from vagueness?...
Peirce claimed that another way to describe generality is where the Law of Excluded Middle ("A or ~A is always true") does not hold. This makes sense because normally, the LEM decides which of "A or ~A" is true (even if we don't know which is decided, it asserts that "out there" it is decided.) When the LEM does not apply "A or ~A" is left undecided, which allows for a generalization on "A or ~A", you can choose which. However the claim that something can be essentially uncertain is directly against the LEM." (p66-68 Nightingale 2019)

I mean to say that reifying vagueness proves the LEM is false, in general. (The ideas of general and of vague are intimately connected) Russell asserted "everything that is, is" in order to "prove" the LEM. And here I am arguing against the LEM, which would also be against "everything that is, is" What makes red red? In this question i mean to be vague between term red and the actual red. If everything that is depends on other things to be, there is a certain spaciousness to Being, an undefined vagueness between Being and Space.

Feint

01 Monday Jan 2024

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment


The shadows of my words grow longer under the setting sun, misspoken,
I stare into the mists of the northern laurel trees.
I wait for warriors to come.
Come, I call in my mind and heart,
Come.

Warriors with blue tattoos scream their battle cry,
and, look there—fighting limbs, heads down, running naked out of the mists.
Like a baby being born, they offer their bodies and their lives.

Emerging from the mists, their bellows make
the fog of war a tangible unknown.

“We will break you,” says the doctor to the baby
as he takes him away, giving the mother a sucker
and a dark waiting room.

They cut his foreskin, tattoo his body with the symbols of a warrior
who screams without shame, none knowing their meaning or power.

Running barefoot, long spears and wide shields,
great magic hums and sparks around him,
because the enemy has war machines.
The enemy doesn’t care for magic—
magic is given to reward virtue,
and virtue preserves the land and sky.
“The only sex that war machines know is rape,”
speaks the druid who knows magic is madness.

But the best part came when the Clockwork Empire
could not make it to the edge of the world: those babes,

brave, running with the chaos of the wind,
offering their bodies and their lives

to their mothers first, and then the northern winters,
and then to the biting and cutting armies
of undead Latin words,

their poetry woven into blue skin-tattoos,
stronger than armor and siege machines.

The Strength of Men was victorious then,
and it will be again.

Oh come,
let them come

naked into the mine fields,
their innocent minds never suspecting the bombs;
they will have only wide
shields and long spears. Warriors that die
find themselves running in green fields
with the sun caught high on their brow,
and if they live the mists will return them
to their brethren.
Against all odds they will win again.

And if they all die, we will all die with them
after a long rape.
There will be nothing left for the machines to ravage.

We will follow those warriors to their fields and a new sun,
whether we like it or not.

Those naked men will leave fertile fields
for us to till in peace.
Swiftly they disappear,
only to emerge from another mist against another enemy.

Their Will cannot be broken.

On Density

16 Saturday Dec 2023

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

cosmology, physics, science, space, universe

One time my father said of my writing that it was very “tightly woven.” We both had a similar way of compacting ideas into a single sentence. He was more artful in his writing. I don’t know what higher praise there is, if writing is not artful, what ought it be? Here I ask how to weave the various ideas in the word Density together. I believe that woven things are a higher art than dense things, and the weave, as a craft, is the Metaphor for metaphor because there are links, nexus points, and emptiness. Density in its physical sense, at most in the sense of gas, means unlinked matter and empty space.

Density also carries the sense of “cloudy” in the Latin “densus.” The sense of dense as meaning stupid is the most recent (non-scientific) development (from etymonline.com entry on dense). I associate cloudy with my own work in the term vagueness, which many will call stupid. My writing, if you haven’t already noticed, is here merely a list of terms that are sort of next to each other the way particles are placed after one another in space. My aim is to weave these ideas together, to claim, for example, that air is not merely particles and space. The particles are linked by something. Actually, the links between particles are found in our definition of the space where the particles are. We claim to know what space is, but I would insist that we do not. This is one point where I am educated enough to feel confident. The rest is drawn from other sources. I am not merely talking about points that are not found on the continuum. I am talking about a nearly complete misunderstanding of space. Space is an unknown. It is the place where things are known. Space is synonymous with the mind; when the mind has arrived at itself. Pure mind holds nothing known. If we could completely fill space with known points, we would still not know space… we would have completely missed the point of space. Isaac Newton knew that the mind was not going to be explainable. The rest he tried to explain with gravity, and in the end he failed to explain gravity. What mechanism causes gravity? No-one knows. We only know that matter has gravity, not how or why. And density determines things like whether a cloud of gas will become a solid planet, or a star, or a black hole, or will diverge into rarer and rarer space.

Space is not a page or a canvas. It is not white or grey or black. A pure mind can be enlightened, but there is no telling if it knows its own enlightenment, just as a lighted space will not reveal its own light.

28 Saturday Oct 2023

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

I fell up


the end of the world is now a commodity
"don't look up" he said until I was a broken record
I was caught in a calculation of romance down to the dash on his chin.
The sky hides in plain sight as we count our footsteps
by watching our fitbit. I looked up, I saw the eclipse and

my paper cut opened a portal to the abyss
I fell into my cubicle, the flimsy walls a spiraling maze,
my mind leaped over the hedges

Giants in the clouds... should I be worried about them?
As I fell up, I wondered.
"What are we going to do about those clouds?"
Asks the newswoman, saying with a million dollars worth of pearls

"Don't worry," she said, "there is a 99% chance of sunshine in a few days"
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • March 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • September 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2016
  • June 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014

Categories

  • AI summaries of Nightingale108
  • Questions in Logic
  • Questions in Mathematics
  • The more technical stuff

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Questions Are Power
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Questions Are Power
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar