• About

Questions Are Power

Questions Are Power

Category Archives: Questions in Logic

Where are questions, a universal part of language, in logic?

Poem of a Prisoner

03 Monday Apr 2023

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

JONATHON CLARK on 3/16/2023 12:52:50 PM wrote

Cautions of skepticism and it’s ease


A whole world of trust issues
bi-polar where both poles themselves
are bi-polar, confused
at whom to trust, skepticism is a satisfying elixir
the drink of easy friends. A fork in the road
it appears commingling the sun and fields of grain

“It all depends on the camera angle.”
is announced over the background of classical piano
a raindrop suite splashed upon our dry face
that we didn’t have a good angle on it is subsumed in peace
the summer smell of algae while fishing under the overpass.
Fish-like, our eyes escaped from traffic and are absorbed
in the crescendo of noise

Alone in the eagles circle joined
by the archetier of hellion, hired by the lily pad
grown deep from the silt of
generations of frogs and pollywog tails like
fruiting bodies, inky caps. Staining the petals
of the water lily. Still and waiting for it’s own
green bee, to sneak by, when the sun ordains.

The moment of pollination
obscured by a dream-like state
the camera could never capture it.
Our faculties fail.
Skeptical scowls are permitted
we release hands with faith in our own past
the cliff we watched from crumbles
we grow wings instead of falling
they glide on silence, embrace the self
transcend the need to be better
a good idea contingent on solipsism

worse things have wings to fly
to float is easy. Never seeing beneath
where goldfish play and delight in currents
our angle reveals the twisting fluid fins
currents that shed no ripple into our reflection.
It shows our smile and we delight again
in the sensation of seeing it.

God in us and the smoothness of water
this watches over our wish for human progress.

Stochastic equilibrium is the shading of forgetfulness
waking between dreams to protect ourselves
with blankets and small rations of food, becoming
self-defined. Winds unbroken by the forests shield
they move our happy vessel mere inches. Adventure
a greater source with the ageless battle of flowers.

The happy people sit on the banks skipping stones as
sinuous swimmers wait to dine on the peaceful doe.
Rising to the surface skeptical that anything less than
blood will do. Sardonic the memory of what you had
and what you lost, but that is just the past.

The present shines; don’t forget take caution
at the ease of skepticism and become the water lily
opening it’s bright eye to see the iridescent
miracle of life for a blink of a dream
The fluid epiphany of nature.

Rocks

01 Saturday Apr 2023

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ 3 Comments

How happy is the little Stone

That rambles in the Road alone,

And doesn’t care about Careers

And Exigencies never fears—

Whose Coat of elemental Brown

A passing Universe put on,

And independent as the Sun

Associates or glows alone,

Fulfilling absolute Decree

In casual simplicity—


Emily Dickinson

This is a hearty attempt at describing the rock. I believe she wants to learn how to be like a rock, because honest things are always good company. Yet there is no leaf or rock or bone that does not have some rhetorical force, something that sways the blade of grass one way or the other. There is no real complete stillness, no perfect vacuum for Newton’s Laws to find their absolute truth. Honesty doesn’t exist, except in the imagination or in spiritualism.

Listen: https://download.pariyatti.org/dwob/samyutta_nikaya_1_168.mp3

The entire world is in flames,
the entire world is going up in smoke;
the entire world is burning,
the entire world is vibrating.
But that which does not vibrate or burn,
which is experienced by the noble ones,
where death has no entry–
in that my mind delights. (Saṃyutta Nikāya 1.168)

Honesty is a lofty goal, one that would be very dangerous to achieve without some protection or isolation.

What we can hope, as most humans cannot undertake a path to being like a rock as it really is, is to set one who is bent one way to be a little more straight, (or bent in the way needed for the moment), not with honesty or saying things just as they are, but with rhetoric.

Buddhist texts are very rhetorical. The Buddha describes the texts as like a raft that you leave behind when you have reached Ultimate Truth.

People really expect a lot of their friends (and rocks as they are experienced) if they want honesty.

Aristotle would say that the formation of a rock “acts out,” imposing its form on the world. But it is not only a bodily, or “thinging” influence. The acting out of a rock is not different from rhetoric, and I am sure Aristotle would disagree with me here.

Rugged individualism, or the term “well, actually …” or FYI (For your Information) have their own brands of rhetoric disguised as honesty. (and mathematics of course, especially mathematics. on this fact, I could speak forever)

What rhetoric doesn’t have this disguise?

This offering I hope will help to see the lie that objects are more honest than people.  A scientist will say, for example, that Nature is a matter of competition and adaptation, and then you will find yourself in a company of people competing with each other and trying to adapt their personalities to be powerful or fearless or whatever, all because this scientist tried to say the truth about Nature. He was trying to be honest (his intention, but still not the truth), and the effect of his trying to be honest was only and always rhetorical. Whether this rhetorical effect is good or bad should be the first question. The ethical status of your words is the foundation, not some appeal to objects and Nature, as if such things were honest.

My attempt to show the lack of truth in Nature has used 3 metaphors so far. Rhetoric is like the wind that blows grass, Rhetoric is like a fire: color, and quality in its most elemental sense. Also Rhetoric is like water, the flood we use the raft to cross.

The shore and the raft are earthy things, a metaphor for truth used by the Buddha, is rhetorical. It is not so that earth is not rhetorical, and Dickinson shows this is so, whether she wanted to or not. It is a poetic puzzle… to describe a rock from the heights and limits of language that is poetry.

09 Thursday Mar 2023

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment



wounds of the soul, lifted
For all to know, The warmth,

the emptiness of words

They speak and I do not hear. I know the message,


again and again and it is only       Shining


Like robes of gold and white,
I cannot see them, I know there is nothing under their veil


The words make me forget words

deep flaws, open wounds, laughable
"Remember them"
they are the only knowledge
An empty knowledge, there is no need to claw for more

I put my head on the ground
Just when the Sun, rising, touches the Earth

Endless Mistakes of Snow

08 Wednesday Feb 2023

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

“To write everything is to put a sword in the hands of a child”

red turns to green, Do not make a difference.

both the same and the different

are cut down all the same by war machines.

Endless mistakes of snow

words falling, failing

My imagination turned black

False stars, ghost stars, the sky envelops us in stone

the weather is our pagan religion, lost within caverns,

faith in the eye of the whirlwind

02 Thursday Feb 2023

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

vacuum salesman

they were hired and fired

on a creative discipline of compulsion

They will come to your door and ask to speak with your children

And your children will recognize them as the friendly guy on TV

They wrote a book “The Big Book of Knowledge (for kids)”

Everything you want to know about

“What if the moon suddenly disappeared?”

There would be space completely unlike the space in a bowl.

The space between subnuclear particles follows the confines of certain ceramics

That can be bent by gravity

Pressure the mind to condense, it will begin emitting gravitational waves

How does gravity grip us across the chasms of space, not just any space, but the space we have defined, the space most inductive to our understanding?

If the mind has control over the pressure acting on itself, could one enact as an act of will? The ability to grip objects across space.

And how would we use this power harmlessly?

By making the actors so poor, that for survival they operate on others minds

to buy vacuums.

—

the brick wall reality makes a house of cards

The hermit creates a fire of austerity.

The warrior depends on his body and the touch of earth beneath his feet.

The riders of the Great Vehicle

Generate a flow of their energies to be harnessed at a loss or gain.

The lovers shun the Prince of Air

The fool is our goddess with child, who’s giving, yielding breasts are the beginning of the wheel of fate.

A human is an even number

And this ghoulish lump that writes 

to self-curb

obscene flaps of skin,

makes light pen strokes that barely touch the page,

gestures of wings disappearing into the white sky,

A sneeze and a tissue to mop this face, afterwards,

the dream continues

science and poetry

22 Sunday Jan 2023

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

I think the word “science” has become too general and ambitious a word. If people look at an octopus, they say they are “doing science”… and maybe they are right, but I prefer that the union of such disparate thinking that is now under the term science would instead occupy a nebulous and all-connecting field of rhetoric. I believe rhetoric is what connects mathematics to poetry and everything between.

Poetry is an exploration of ideas-as-sensation and the texture of language. In that sense it is a science, not a science of the mind, but a science of the contact of the mind with mind-objects like ideas. In this sense poetry is quite a vast realm of doors to new knowledge. It replaces much of what we consider science, and It is limited only by a consideration of what is direct sensation with the other 5 sense-doors. If the mind intervenes with our other sensations, such as in an expanded uncertainty principle, we return to the realm of poetry.

I cannot emphasize well the shift I am describing, where body-contact (such as sex) is sensed with the body, not the brain or the mind. The body and all its organs don’t have their center in the brain. The sources of knowledge are decentralized when mind-objects are distinct from body-objects and tongue-objects. I am describing a return to the whole human organism, where sex-as-knowledge, eye-contact-as-knowledge, etc is not centered in an ethereal observer that has never been found even in the brain. Transcendence can come later, after we have returned and recognized the objects of mind (as distinct from the mind) distinct from other direct sources of knowledge.

With this return, thoughts, which are just another kind sensuality, can be brought down from its heights, and real transcendence of all 6 sense-doors can be pursued.

The Animal Life is Profound

05 Thursday Jan 2023

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

https://fb.watch/hSO6icPQhd/

Cry Saint

13 Tuesday Dec 2022

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

Cry Saint and the world will shrug
Like a nursery rhyme that children don't listen to
Because they already know it is true. Truth is boring and tiresome,
We want the unthinkable, a shock you never saw coming
Cracking like a blue moon
To the Buddha-ghost-mind an unthinkable there is
Of mushrooms, there is one of which the holy books speak
A Saint who can consume them without death, only indigestion, but,
(I am serious... or they are, and I try to be... for them...
text me for the book title and page number),
This part about mushrooms is solidly in the Buddhist Theravada canon, but...
As if this weren't laborious enough I want to ask about seriousness, in all seriousness,

How can I not laugh about this murderer Pythagoras 
Who also taught everyone in his cult not to eat beans?
Pythagoras who drowned his student to cover up a math proof
that "not everything is number"?

Archimedes, the archmage who used the law of parabolas to burn down ships at a great distance, enemies of his king. The higher law... was it the parabolas or the burning ships?
I am on a burning ship and it is not funny. Parabolas are a silly I-told-you-so entertainment in comparison.

We want truth, we want to believe the ball gets picked up again and again, rising higher and higher,
But the ball drops over and over. 
Now we drop it again, staring into a parabolic mirror.
Progress is a dream and it is only sad because it is a dream.
Otherwise it just wouldn't be at all.

Don't the lessons of Mother Goose teach anything
About surfing solar waves
Or what of clouds is unthinkable?

03 Saturday Dec 2022

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

The Wealth of Heaven Shines in Rain

How to own a waterfall?
Abundance, do not make a coin from it.
The water wheel is less generous than the water
The market of fate hurries away when the rain falls
May fate be the rain, may it not be the market
Rain spilling like a young mother's milk
We, her babies, sap her bones... but who?
We don't know who we are, we only see something
and our hearts-blood moves:

A babe at the breast, warm loving gratitude

Where is the universe except here?
Where is knowing and not knowing without this?
Careful with the question "who?"
This question belongs to the Owner of the Night
in trees quivering in the night wind, you may find Night's messenger.

The owl will only mirror your question.

It is this emptying that creates fullness
Emptying and filling one vessel at the same time, a mystery of our hearts

As we yearn for a generous world,
For our hearts of stone to grow moss, an endless sprouting, invincible,
We as a multitude must spill wine for the gods.

Spiller

02 Friday Dec 2022

Posted by Andrew Nightingale in Questions in Logic

≈ Leave a comment

in honor of studio ghibli

Spiller wears the coat of a rat
He uses it to fly
The Lorelai likes his strength

he tried to woo her
With a feast of grasshopper leg
His manners are non-existent,

he is a great survivor, and his friends all need survival, which he shares.

Spiller is a small man, tiny, easily missed

The great men the Lorelai loved were too big, so she accepted the raspberry
An off-hand gift of Spiller

Under a hot lustful sun,
To the sound of a flute with a golden chip in its throat

They floated in liquid passionate lovemaking
Over a river of Tea.
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • March 2026
  • January 2026
  • November 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • September 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • April 2016
  • June 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014

Categories

  • Questions in Logic
  • Questions in Mathematics
  • The more technical stuff

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Questions Are Power
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Questions Are Power
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar